Simply astonishing stuff. Truly one of the most remarkable games of cricket, with records falling, reputations being restored and stars being born. The match itself ebbed and flowed with England's initial collapse (30-4) sparking all the Pietersen chat before the ridiculously long batting line-up proving its value. New Zealand's batting display then demonstrated how blunt and one-dimensional our bowling attack was. Early wickets in our reply left the Kiwi victory simply a matter of time until Cook's infuriating stubbornness put itself to good use and Stokes batted like he'd got confused with the IPL final happening at the same time. The blunt bowling attack which we all know is so reliant on Anderson then came good, with wickets coming from all over the place.
As outstanding and dramatic a game as it was, the end result unquestionably papers over a few cracks. With all of the attention on Stokes' remarkable performance, there remains a few questions over the opening partner for Cook, the feasibility of Moeen as a genuine spin-bowler and the genuine threat posed by the fast bowlers when the going gets tough. That being said, there are a lot of positive signs and just an outside glimmer of hope now that we might not get totally obliterated in the Ashes.
To the matter at hand; the Ben Stokes bandwagon. A brilliant performance from an exciting prospect with undoubted potential but a long way to go before being a top quality performer. He has talent, desire and a fiercely competitive spirit but what he'll need to learn from players like Cook is application. Two outstanding and destructive innings could each have been big hundreds. Am I being too harsh or is it good to expect big things? Certainly if Stokes is hoping to be the next big thing, he has a whole host of a way to go.
Widely accepted as the greatest all-rounder in history is Gary Sobers, with the likes of Jacques Kallis, Ian Botham, Kapil Dev and Imran Khan knocking on the door. The great measure of an all-rounder is of the differential between their batting and bowling averages. The below table shows test all-rounders with at least 100 wickets at less than 40 AND 3000 test runs at greater than 30
The results demonstrate what we'd expect to see, Sobers and Kallis with incredible batting averages and very solid bowling stats, with the likes of Khan and Pollock the other way round. Here are Stokes' figures at the moment:
Evidently a long way to go! But of course how can you compare him so early in his career to those more established? Have a look at their stats after 10 test matches of course:
What can we learn from this? The same as with a lot of statistics, especially with such a small quantity of data to look, they're meaningless. Stokes' career could go either way.
Widely accepted as the greatest all-rounder in history is Gary Sobers, with the likes of Jacques Kallis, Ian Botham, Kapil Dev and Imran Khan knocking on the door. The great measure of an all-rounder is of the differential between their batting and bowling averages. The below table shows test all-rounders with at least 100 wickets at less than 40 AND 3000 test runs at greater than 30
GS
Sobers (WI)
|
93
|
8032
|
57.78
|
235
|
34.03
|
23.74
|
JH
Kallis (ICC/SA)
|
166
|
13289
|
55.37
|
292
|
32.65
|
22.71
|
Imran
Khan (Pak)
|
88
|
3807
|
37.69
|
362
|
22.81
|
14.88
|
KR
Miller (Aus)
|
55
|
2958
|
36.97
|
170
|
22.97
|
13.99
|
SM
Pollock (SA)
|
108
|
3781
|
32.31
|
421
|
23.11
|
9.19
|
TL
Goddard (SA)
|
41
|
2516
|
34.46
|
123
|
26.22
|
8.23
|
AW
Greig (Eng)
|
58
|
3599
|
40.43
|
141
|
32.20
|
8.23
|
Shakib
Al Hasan (Ban)
|
39
|
2732
|
40.17
|
142
|
33.29
|
6.88
|
IT
Botham (Eng)
|
102
|
5200
|
33.54
|
383
|
28.40
|
5.14
|
CL
Cairns (NZ)
|
62
|
3320
|
33.53
|
218
|
29.40
|
4.13
|
W
Rhodes (Eng)
|
58
|
2325
|
30.19
|
127
|
26.96
|
3.22
|
N
Kapil Dev (India)
|
131
|
5248
|
31.05
|
434
|
29.64
|
1.40
|
MH
Mankad (India)
|
44
|
2109
|
31.47
|
162
|
32.32
|
-0.84
|
A
Flintoff (Eng/ICC)
|
79
|
3845
|
31.77
|
226
|
32.78
|
-1.01
|
DL
Vettori (ICC/NZ)
|
113
|
4531
|
30.00
|
362
|
34.36
|
-4.36
|
Miller, Sobers, Kallis, Khan & Dev |
|
Mat
|
Runs
|
Bat Av
|
Wkts
|
Bowl Av
|
Ave Diff
|
Ben Stokes
|
10
|
648
|
36.00
|
28
|
40.10
|
-4.10
|
Evidently a long way to go! But of course how can you compare him so early in his career to those more established? Have a look at their stats after 10 test matches of course:
GS
Sobers
|
419
|
29.92
|
12
|
35
|
-5.07
|
JH
Kallis
|
340
|
22.66
|
11
|
30
|
-7.33
|
Imran
Khan
|
288
|
20.57
|
37
|
33.86
|
-13.29
|
SM
Pollock
|
344
|
28.66
|
30
|
23.96
|
4.7
|
IT
Botham
|
479
|
43.54
|
53
|
17.33
|
26.2
|
N
Kapil Dev
|
510
|
42.5
|
29
|
39.06
|
3.43
|
A
Flintoff
|
255
|
15.93
|
7
|
66.42
|
-50.49
|
What can we learn from this? The same as with a lot of statistics, especially with such a small quantity of data to look, they're meaningless. Stokes' career could go either way.
A side note is that if we simply look at the difference between batting & bowling averages then it becomes clear who the real best all-rounders are in history:
Player
|
Mat
|
Runs
|
Bat Av
|
Wkts
|
Bowl Av
|
Ave Diff
|
DG
Bradman (Aus)
|
52
|
6996
|
99.94
|
2
|
36.00
|
63.94
|
AN
Cook (Eng)
|
113
|
8869
|
46.67
|
1
|
7.00
|
39.67
|
Statistically the best two all-rounders in all of test cricket history |
No comments:
Post a Comment